Prediction of Patricia Ward Hales vs Maud Galtier Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
P. Ward Hales vs M. Galtier

Patricia Ward Hales

GBR

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

112

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Maud Galtier

FRA

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

112

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Hales 1 - 1 Galtier

They have played 6 sets in total, with Patricia Ward Hales winning 2 and Maud Galtier winning 4. The last match between Patricia Ward Hales and Maud Galtier was at the Paris Indoors, 16-02-1959, Round: , Surface: Carpet, with Patricia Ward Hales getting the victory 6-4 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Hales	1
Galtier	1

Last 3 H2H Matches:

() Paris Indoors(02-16-59)

Stats

Patricia Ward Hales

Maud Galtier

(F) Lyon(02-15-54)

Stats

Maud Galtier

Patricia Ward Hales

(R4) Paris Indoors(02-04-54)

Stats

Maud Galtier

Patricia Ward Hales

P. W. Hales vs M. Galtier H2H Profile

P. W. Hales	Stats	M. Galtier
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
62.00% (292-179)	Career Total W/L	49.20% (92-95)
1	Indoor	1
1	Total H2H Matches	1
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

P. W. Hales vs M. Galtier Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Patricia Ward Hales has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Maud Galtier has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Patricia Ward Hales, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Maud Galtier has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Patricia Ward Hales has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Maud Galtier has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Patricia Ward Hales has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Maud Galtier winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Patricia Ward Hales has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 63% (W/L 35/21), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 58% (W/L 65/47). Maud Galtier has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 63% (W/L 28/13), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/2).
Player level: In the last year, Patricia Ward Hales has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Maud Galtier has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Patricia Ward Hales winning 1 times and Maud Galtier being victorious 2 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Patricia Ward Hales winning 2 and Maud Galtier winning 4.
The last match between Patricia Ward Hales and Maud Galtier was at the Paris Indoors, 16-02-1959, Round: , Surface: Carpet, with Patricia Ward Hales getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Patricia Ward Hales has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Maud Galtier has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Patricia Ward Hales has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Maud Galtier has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Patricia Ward Hales has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Maud Galtier has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Patricia Ward Hales vs Maud Galtier Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

P. W. Hales vs M. Galtier H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

P. W. Hales	Stats	M. Galtier
1	H2H Matches Won	2
2	Sets Won	4
25	Games Won	31
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
33% (1/3)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	67% (2/3)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (2/2)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/2)
0% (0/2)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

P. W. Hales Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Chingford - 16-04-1962
R3 Mrs P BradfordM. P	L	6-3 6-2	Stats
Havant - 17-07-1961
F B NicholsonB. Nicholson	W	6-2 6-0	Stats
Wimbledon - 26-06-1961
R2 Edda BudingE. Buding	L	6-1 6-1	Stats
Queens Club - 19-06-1961
R2 Vera SukovaV. Sukova	L	6-2 3-6 6-3	Stats
Beckenham - 12-06-1961
R3 Lesley TurnerL. Turner	L	6-2 6-3	Stats

View All

M. Galtier Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Aix-En-Provence - 27-03-1967
R3 Galina BaksheevaG. Baksheeva	L	6-1 6-3	Stats
Roland Garros - 22-05-1966
R1 Carole GraebnerC. Graebner	W	W/O	Stats
R2 Esme EmmanuelE. Emmanuel	L	6-0 6-3	Stats
Cannes - 03-10-1965
Q1 Rosie ReyesR. Reyes	L	6-1 6-3	Stats
Roland Garros - 17-05-1965
R1 Julie HeldmanJ. Heldman	L	6-4 6-0	Stats

View All

P. W. Hales vs M. Galtier Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

P. W. Hales	Stats	M. Galtier
62.00% (292/179)	YTD Win/Loss	49.20% (92/95)
61.07% (615/392)	Sets Win/Loss	48.06% (198/214)
100.00% (4978/0)	Games Win/Loss	48.76% (1803/1895)
60.00% (3/2)	Hard Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
62.07% (144/88)	Clay Win/Loss	36.05% (31/55)
68.18% (45/21)	Indoor Hard W/L	56.14% (32/25)
58.04% (65/47)	Grass Win/Loss	33.33% (1/2)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
58.33% (28/20)	Slam W/L	33.33% (10/20)
63% (283/452)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	48% (85/178)
0% (0/0)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	100% (1/1)
53% (50/95)	Deciding Set Win %	54% (28/52)
91% (285/259)	1st Set Won, Won Match	86% (83/71)
8% (285/24)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	14% (83/12)
15% (172/25)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	16% (97/16)